eVTOL Air Taxi Energy per Trip
Estimate eVTOL hover and cruise power, battery energy per trip, reserve requirements and landing SOC. Animate the mission and compare cruise distance with the available energy budget.
Estimate how much battery energy a winged electric air taxi needs for one flight, and how much should remain when it lands. This eVTOL energy calculation combines a hover power calculator, level-cruise aerodynamics, phase durations and an explicit reserve budget. It is intended for engineers, students and early mission trade studies.
Enter the complete takeoff mass, number and diameter of the lifting rotors, and air density at the limiting hover condition. The disks must be equal and non-overlapping. Hover figure of merit accounts for aerodynamic rotor losses; battery-to-shaft efficiency accounts for electrical and mechanical losses. The defaults describe an illustrative aircraft, rather than a Joby or another manufacturer's specification.
Next enter the whole-aircraft aerodynamic L/D and propeller efficiency at the chosen cruise true airspeed. Cruise distance is the ground distance covered during level cruise. A positive headwind reduces ground speed and extends flight time without changing the assumed airspeed or cruise power. Departure climb and arrival descent are separate timed phases. Their power factors multiply hover propulsion power, with the continuous auxiliary load added afterward. These factors must include the vehicle's transition, climb and acceleration requirements.
Set new battery capacity, capacity state of health, departure SOC and the minimum SOC floor. SOC entries are fractions: 0.95 means 95%. The floor protects energy that this budget treats as unavailable. Choose the timed reserve duration and its power basis, then add any extra contingency energy. Trip energy is consumed; reserve energy remains carried at the planned landing. The reported surplus subtracts both reserve and floor, so a positive landing SOC alone does not establish that the budget is sufficient.
Press ▶ beside mission time to follow the aircraft and watch its battery drain. The SOC chart shows the entire flight. The distance chart shows where the trip-plus-reserve requirement reaches the energy available above the floor. Its intersection gives an air taxi battery range estimate for the entered cruise condition, with the other phase durations fixed.
The 20-minute default illustrates the conditional U.S. VFR provision described by FAA AC 194-1, dated October 7, 2024, section 5.7. Aircraft flight-manual capability to land vertically along the entire route matters; this is not a universal reserve or a Dubai operating rule. Select requirements for the actual jurisdiction and operation, and check against the rules in force. Regulatory context was reviewed on October 28, 2026.
This preliminary model does not determine certification compliance or authorize dispatch. It omits a drag polar, detailed transitions, stall margins, rotor interference, gusts, transient power, thermal limits and voltage-dependent battery behavior. Capacity sizing holds aircraft mass fixed; increasing the installed battery requires a separate mass and performance iteration. Validate phase averages, available discharge power and landing capability against aircraft data before drawing operational conclusions.
How it is calculated
Out-of-ground-effect actuator-disk momentum theory gives , , and . Divide ideal power by hover figure of merit and battery-to-shaft efficiency, then add auxiliary load. Leishman, Helicopters, sections Induced Velocity, Power Required to Hover, and The da Vinci Aerial Screw, gives the derivation and worked checks. NASA RVLT (2018), PDF p. 1, defines figure of merit and effective L/D; Table 3 on PDF p. 12 supplies geometry and cruise consistency checks.
For wing-borne level cruise, and . Use aerodynamic L/D for normal inputs. NASA's effective already includes a power effect, so the reference case alone sets efficiencies to unity to avoid counting those losses twice.
Each phase consumes . Departure and arrival propulsion powers are empirical multiples of hover propulsion power, with auxiliaries added separately. Reserve is and is not consumed on the planned flight. With , landing SOC is ; surplus above reserve and floor is . The cruise-distance limit solves the same budget with fixed non-cruise phases. The animation integrates these constant phase powers exactly.
Discharge-power validation counts only flight phases with positive duration. The selected reserve power is checked separately whenever timed reserve duration is positive; energy sufficiency alone does not establish power capability.
Assumptions
- Winged battery-electric aircraft, constant mass, equal independent lift disks and steady out-of-ground-effect hover. No ground-effect credit or regeneration.
- L/D is aerodynamic and valid at the selected true airspeed. Constant efficiencies and auxiliary load; air density changes only hover power because cruise aerodynamics are supplied as inputs.
- Transition/climb and descent powers are phase averages entered as factors; no altitude, climb-rate, acceleration or descent aerodynamics are solved. Their route distance is outside the level-cruise input.
- Capacity state of health scales full-charge energy. SOC is approximated as energy fraction, rather than electrochemical or coulomb-counted SOC. Nameplate energy and floor must use a consistent basis.
- All defaults, including 5 kWh additional contingency energy and 700 kW discharge capability, are illustrative assumptions, not manufacturer data or regulatory allowances.
Where it applies
Preliminary mission energy and sensitivity estimates, not an aircraft sizing optimizer or dispatch tool. The energy-only battery requirement holds aircraft mass fixed. Active flight-phase average powers and any positive-duration timed-reserve power are compared with the entered available battery power, but rotor, motor, transient, voltage, temperature, stall and failure limits are not resolved. Overlapping/coaxial disks and rotor-borne cruise require another model. Negative surplus indicates a budget shortfall; a negative SOC is an extrapolated energy deficit, not a physical battery state.
Regulatory example: FAA SFAR 120 / 14 CFR 194.306(ss), as explained by AC 194-1 (October 7, 2024), section 5.7, PDF p. 32, allows the helicopter-equivalent 20-minute VFR provision only with the applicable vertical-landing capability along the route. Other operations may require different reserves or authorized deviations. Context reviewed October 28, 2026; check against the rules in force, aircraft flight manual and operator approvals. The calculator does not establish eligibility or model an emergency descent or diversion.
References
- Silva, C., Johnson, W., Antcliff, K. R., and Patterson, M. D. (2018). VTOL Urban Air Mobility Concept Vehicles for Technology Development. NASA NTRS 20180006683, PDF pp. 1–3 and 11–12. https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20180006683
- Leishman, J. G. Introduction to Aerospace Flight Vehicles, Helicopters: momentum theory and The da Vinci Aerial Screw worked example. https://eaglepubs.erau.edu/introductiontoaerospaceflightvehicles/chapter/helicopters/
- FAA. AC 194-1, Powered-Lift Operations, October 7, 2024, section 5.7, printed p. 5-5 / PDF p. 32. https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/AC_194-1.pdf
- FAA. Integration of Powered-Lift: Pilot Certification and Operations; Miscellaneous Amendments Related to Rotorcraft and Airplanes, final rule, 89 FR 92296 (November 21, 2024), including 14 CFR 194.306(ss). https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-11-21/pdf/2024-24886.pdf
Inputs
| Input | Symbol | Unit | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| Takeoff mass Total mass including battery, occupants, pilot and payload. Mass stays constant during flight. | m_air | kg | 2200 |
| Number of lift rotors Equal, non-overlapping lifting disks. Do not count a separate cruise propeller. | n_rot | 6 | |
| Lift rotor diameter Equal rotor diameters. Coaxial or overlapping rotors need an effective-area model outside this tool. | d_rot | m | 2.8 |
| Air density for hover Enter density at the limiting hover location and conditions; 1.225 kg/m³ is standard sea level. | rho_air | kg/m^3 | 1.225 |
| Hover figure of merit Ideal induced power divided by actual rotor shaft power. 0.75 is illustrative; use vehicle data. | FM_h | 0.75 | |
| Battery-to-shaft efficiency Combined wiring, inverter, motor and gearbox efficiency from battery terminals to shaft; excludes rotor/propeller aerodynamic losses. | eta_drive | 0.92 | |
| Aerodynamic cruise L/D Whole-aircraft aerodynamic lift/drag at the selected true airspeed. Do not substitute an effective W·V/P ratio directly; that ratio already includes a power loss boundary. See the method and reference case. | LD_air | 12 | |
| Cruise propeller efficiency Useful thrust power divided by cruise shaft power. Use vehicle data at the selected cruise condition. | eta_prop | 0.8 | |
| Continuous auxiliary load Battery-side avionics, cooling, cabin and other constant loads, included in every flight phase. | P_aux | kW | 5 |
| Available battery discharge power Available battery-terminal power at the limiting SOC and temperature. Checked against active flight phases and any timed reserve; transient peaks and motor ratings are outside this model. | P_limit | kW | 700 |
| Cruise ground distance Distance covered only in the level-cruise phase. Add route and maneuver allowances to the phase inputs. | R_cruise | km | 50 |
| Cruise true airspeed L/D and propeller efficiency must correspond to this speed; neither is recalculated from a drag polar. | v_air | km/h | 200 |
| Along-route headwind Positive means headwind, negative means tailwind. Cruise ground speed is true airspeed minus this value. | v_wind | km/h | 10 |
| Takeoff hover time Out-of-ground-effect hover-equivalent time at departure. | t_take | s | 30 |
| Departure transition/climb time Time beyond takeoff hover, including transition, acceleration and climb. | t_out | s | 90 |
| Departure power / hover propulsion power Average battery propulsion power relative to hover; auxiliaries are added separately. Include climb and acceleration demand in this empirical factor. | k_out | 1.1 | |
| Arrival descent/transition time Time beyond level cruise and before landing hover. No battery regeneration is assumed. | t_in | s | 90 |
| Arrival power / hover propulsion power Average battery propulsion power during descent and transition. Use a measured or simulated phase average. | k_in | 0.65 | |
| Landing hover time Out-of-ground-effect hover-equivalent time at arrival. | t_land | s | 30 |
| New battery energy capacity New full-charge energy deliverable at the battery terminals. Use energy in kWh, not cell capacity in Ah, and keep this basis consistent with the SOC floor. | C_nom | kWh | 200 |
| Capacity state of health Current full-charge capacity / new nameplate capacity; 0.90 means 90% capacity remains. | SOH_b | 0.9 | |
| Departure state of charge Energy-based SOC fraction of the current full-charge capacity; 0.95 means 95%. | s_start | 0.95 | |
| Minimum SOC floor Energy below this SOC is unavailable to the mission and reserve. It is separate from the timed reserve. | s_floor | 0.15 | |
| Timed reserve duration Editable example: 20 min is the conditional U.S. VFR helicopter-equivalent provision, not a universal eVTOL requirement. | t_res | min | 20 |
| Timed reserve power basis Select the normal power basis required for your scenario. A hover reserve is far more demanding than a cruise reserve. | reserve_mode | Cruise electrical power | |
| Reserve electrical power Total battery-side power including auxiliaries, from aircraft data. | P_res_input | kW | 150 |
| Additional contingency energy Extra carried allowance beyond the timed reserve, for example another landing or diversion; 5 kWh is illustrative, not a regulatory value. | E_cont | kWh | 5 |
| Mission time ▶ Press play to move through the flight and watch the battery drain. The reserve remains on board at the planned landing. | t_play | min | 8 |
Results
With the default inputs above, the calc gives:
| Result | Value |
|---|---|
| Trip energy consumed | 66.527 kWh |
| Reserve energy carried | 51.903 kWh |
| Landing SOC (%) | 58.04 |
| Surplus above reserve and SOC floor | 25.569 kWh |
| Hover electrical power | 487.73 kW |
| Cruise electrical power | 140.71 kW |
| Model cruise-distance limit | 84.526 km |
| Minimum new battery energy at fixed mass | 164.487 kWh |
| Trip duration | 19.789 min |
Checked against sources
Each case below was calculated by this calc and agrees with the value from its source (within the tolerance where one is shown).
Leishman 5 m disk, 1000 N: ideal hover power
Source: J. Gordon Leishman, Helicopters, section The da Vinci Aerial Screw, worked actuator-disk example: diameter 5 m, thrust 1000 N, density 1.225 kg/m³, published ideal power 4.6 kW. https://eaglepubs.erau.edu/introductiontoaerospaceflightvehicles/chapter/helicopters/ . Published value is rounded; unrounded momentum theory gives 4.55934 kW.
Inputs: Takeoff mass = 102 kg; Number of lift rotors = 1; Lift rotor diameter = 5 m; Hover figure of merit = 1; Battery-to-shaft efficiency = 1; Continuous auxiliary load = 0 kW; the others as above.
| Result | Source | This calc |
|---|---|---|
| Ideal hover induced power | 4.6 ± 0.05 kW | 4.559 kW |
Leishman low figure of merit: actual rotor power
Source: Leishman, Helicopters, The da Vinci Aerial Screw: the same 5 m, 1000 N disk with FM = 0.3 is reported as 4.6/0.3 = 15.3 kW. https://eaglepubs.erau.edu/introductiontoaerospaceflightvehicles/chapter/helicopters/ . The source divides its already-rounded 4.6 kW; correct unrounded physics gives 15.1978 kW. Tolerance covers that intermediate rounding; no coefficient is fitted.
Inputs: Takeoff mass = 102 kg; Number of lift rotors = 1; Lift rotor diameter = 5 m; Hover figure of merit = 0.3; Battery-to-shaft efficiency = 1; Continuous auxiliary load = 0 kW; the others as above.
| Result | Source | This calc |
|---|---|---|
| Actual hover rotor shaft power | 15.3 ± 0.15 kW | 15.198 kW |
NASA RVLT electric Lift+Cruise: disk loading
Source: Silva et al. (2018), NASA NTRS 20180006683, Table 3, PDF p. 12: electric Lift+Cruise gross weight 8210 lb, 8 lift rotors of 5 ft radius, tabulated disk loading 13.1 lbf/ft². Treat listed gross-weight lb as lbm under standard gravity. Computed 13.0666 lbf/ft² lies within the table's 0.1 lbf/ft² rounding; area is independently calculated from the published geometry.
Inputs: Takeoff mass = 3,724 kg; Number of lift rotors = 8; Lift rotor diameter = 3.048 m; the others as above.
| Result | Source | This calc |
|---|---|---|
| Hover disk loading | 627.2 ± 3 Pa | 625.6 Pa |
| Total lifting disk area | 58.373 m² | 58.373 m² |
NASA RVLT effective L/D and cruise power consistency
Source: NASA NTRS 20180006683, Table 3, PDF p. 12, electric Lift+Cruise: 8210 lb, best-range speed 112 KTAS, effective L/De = W·v/P of 8.5 and weight/cruise power 24.9 lb/hp imply 245.871 kW. Set both efficiencies to 1 only for this check because L/De already includes the shaft-power effect. The model gives 247.552 kW; 2.5 kW tolerance covers the table's rounded ratios and operating-point reporting. This tests cruise power, not reproduction of the full NDARC mission.
Inputs: Takeoff mass = 3,724 kg; Number of lift rotors = 8; Lift rotor diameter = 3.048 m; Cruise true airspeed = 207.4 km/h; Aerodynamic cruise L/D = 8.5; Cruise propeller efficiency = 1; Battery-to-shaft efficiency = 1; Continuous auxiliary load = 0 kW; the others as above.
| Result | Source | This calc |
|---|---|---|
| Cruise electrical power | 245.9 ± 2.5 kW | 247.6 kW |
Regression: 800 kW timed reserve exceeds a 700 kW battery limit
Source: Independent review regression fixture, October 28, 2026. A positive-duration custom reserve at 800 kW exceeds the 700 kW discharge rating by 100 kW, even though the planned flight is below the rating. Reserve energy is independently 800 kW × 5/60 h. This is a validation regression, not published aircraft performance data.
Inputs: Timed reserve power basis = Custom electrical power; Reserve electrical power = 800 kW; Timed reserve duration = 5 min; the others as above.
| Result | Source | This calc |
|---|---|---|
| Available discharge-power margin during timed reserve | -100 kW | -100 kW |
| Timed reserve energy | 66.667 kWh | 66.667 kWh |
| Available discharge-power margin during planned flight | 164 kW | 164 kW |
Regression: a zero-duration timed reserve adds no power requirement
Source: Boundary regression accompanying the independent power review, October 28, 2026. A timed reserve lasting zero minutes requires zero timed-reserve energy and contributes no active reserve power, regardless of its stored power setting. The separate contingency-energy allowance remains in the budget.
Inputs: Timed reserve power basis = Custom electrical power; Reserve electrical power = 800 kW; Timed reserve duration = 0 min; the others as above.
| Result | Source | This calc |
|---|---|---|
| Reserve power counted when timed reserve is required | 0 kW | 0 kW |
| Available discharge-power margin during timed reserve | 700 kW | 700 kW |
| Timed reserve energy | 0 kWh | 0 kWh |
Regression: cruise-only mission excludes all zero-duration lift phases
Source: Phase-activation boundary fixture accompanying the independent review, October 28, 2026. All four non-cruise durations are zero. Only default cruise power, independently cross-checked from W·V/(L/D·ηp·ηd) plus auxiliaries as 140.709981381 kW, contributes to the flight power limit; a 200 kW rating leaves 59.290018619 kW.
Inputs: Takeoff hover time = 0 s; Departure transition/climb time = 0 s; Arrival descent/transition time = 0 s; Landing hover time = 0 s; Available battery discharge power = 200 kW; the others as above.
| Result | Source | This calc |
|---|---|---|
| Highest modeled phase-average electrical power | 140.7 kW | 140.7 kW |
| Available discharge-power margin during planned flight | 59.29 kW | 59.29 kW |
Regression: excessive headwind leaves time helpers finite
Source: Independent review regression fixture, October 28, 2026: 200 km/h airspeed and 210 km/h headwind must be rejected by the ground-speed condition. Zero cruise/display time is a guarded placeholder; the other phase durations total 4 min. These are input-validation checks, not aircraft performance reference data.
Inputs: Along-route headwind = 210 km/h; the others as above.
| Result | Source | This calc |
|---|---|---|
| Level-cruise duration | 0 min | 0 min |
| Trip duration | 4 min | 4 min |
| Displayed mission time | 0 min | 0 min |
Regression: zero ground speed leaves time helpers finite
Source: Zero-ground-speed boundary fixture accompanying the independent review, October 28, 2026. Equal 200 km/h airspeed and headwind must produce the wind input error. Cruise and animation helpers use finite zero placeholders rather than division by zero; the other phase durations total 4 min. Result cards remain withheld.
Inputs: Along-route headwind = 200 km/h; the others as above.
| Result | Source | This calc |
|---|---|---|
| Level-cruise duration | 0 min | 0 min |
| Trip duration | 4 min | 4 min |
| Displayed mission time | 0 min | 0 min |
| Cruise duration across the distance sweep [101] | 0 min | 0 min |
| Model cruise-distance limit | 0 km | 0 km |
Regression: unused departure power does not fail the flight limit
Source: Independent review regression fixture, October 28, 2026. Departure duration is zero, so its 3× hover propulsion power is excluded. The highest remaining phase is default hover, independently cross-checked as 487.730016567 kW; a 500 kW rating therefore leaves 12.269983433 kW margin. This tests phase activation, not a published aircraft benchmark.
Inputs: Departure transition/climb time = 0 s; Departure power / hover propulsion power = 3; Available battery discharge power = 500 kW; the others as above.
| Result | Source | This calc |
|---|---|---|
| Departure power counted for a nonzero-duration phase | 0 kW | 0 kW |
| Highest modeled phase-average electrical power | 487.7 kW | 487.7 kW |
| Available discharge-power margin during planned flight | 12.27 kW | 12.27 kW |







Responses