Rotating Disc & Ring: Stress, Growth and Burst Speed

Calculate centrifugal stress, radial growth, shrink-fit separation and burst speed for a solid disc or ring with variable thickness and an optional thermal gradient.

#burst-speed #centrifugal-stress #plane-stress #radial-growth #rotating-disc #Runge–Kutta #shrink-fit #thin-ring

This rotating disc stress calculator estimates how far a spinning metal disc or ring expands, where its stresses peak, and which speeds mark hub separation, first local yield and an average-stress burst estimate. It is intended for engineers comparing rotor concepts, students checking elasticity calculations, and people assessing a flywheel or other rotating part before detailed analysis.

Choose a solid disc or a bored disc, then enter the radii and rotational speed. A narrow annulus approaches the thin-ring limit automatically. Thickness may be uniform, linearly tapered, exponentially tapered, or specified at nine equally spaced radial stations. The custom profile uses a smooth, shape-preserving interpolant through those thicknesses. Enter enough stations to represent the features of interest; abrupt shoulders require a local three-dimensional model.

The steel selector supplies elastic properties and nominal structural steel strengths. Choose custom material properties for aluminium, other alloys, heat treatments or operating temperatures. Use tensile and yield strengths appropriate to the actual product, thickness and temperature. A steel preset is useful for comparison, but is not a material certificate for a rotor forging.

For a shrink fit, specify radial interference: half the difference between the free hub diameter and bore diameter. The model includes both disc compliance and a solid hub’s elastic compression, centrifugal growth and uniform thermal expansion. The separation speed is where contact pressure first becomes zero during increasing speed. A blank separation speed means there is no fitted hub or no finite centrifugal separation in this model. Thermal inputs are temperature changes from the stress-free state at which interference was specified. The disc temperature varies linearly from the inner station to the rim.

The stress plot shows radial, tangential and von Mises stress across the radius. The speed plots show radial growth, loss of fit and the distinction between local yielding and the average tangential stress criterion. Increasing speed produces centrifugal stress proportional to speed squared while the contact state is unchanged. Radial growth includes both thermal and fit effects; it may be negative under cooling.

Burst speed is a strength criterion applied to an elastic equilibrium solution, not a simulation of fracture. Growth and local stresses beyond first yield are elastic extrapolations. This centrifugal stress flywheel burst speed calculation excludes plastic redistribution, cracks, fatigue, residual stress, keyways, bolt holes, blades, imbalance, bending and containment design. The hub model assumes free axial faces and plane stress; a long constrained shaft needs a different compliance model. Use the radial grid control to verify convergence for unusual profiles.

How it is calculated

The model solves axisymmetric radial equilibrium for the actual thickness h(r)h(r):

d(rhσr)dr−hσθ+ρω2r2h=0.\frac{d(rh\sigma_r)}{dr}-h\sigma_\theta+\rho\omega^2r^2h=0.

Plane-stress elasticity gives σr=E1−ν2[u′+νu/r−(1+ν)αΔT]\sigma_r=\frac{E}{1-\nu^2}[u'+\nu u/r-(1+\nu)\alpha\Delta T] and σθ=Eu/r+νσr−EαΔT\sigma_\theta=Eu/r+\nu\sigma_r-E\alpha\Delta T.

With x=r/bx=r/b, d=u/bd=u/b, H=h/h(a)H=h/h(a) and f=xHσr/Ef=xH\sigma_r/E, the shooting equations are

d′=−νd/x+(1−ν2)f/(xH)+(1+ν)αΔT,d'=-\nu d/x+(1-\nu^2)f/(xH)+(1+\nu)\alpha\Delta T,
f′=Hd/x+νf/x−HαΔT−ηx2H,η=ρω2b2/E.f'=Hd/x+\nu f/x-H\alpha\Delta T-\eta x^2H,\qquad\eta=\rho\omega^2b^2/E.

Fourth-order Runge–Kutta integrates separate pressure, rotation and thermal load bases on a logarithmic radial grid. Linear shooting enforces zero rim traction. The annular bore has σr=−p\sigma_r=-p; a solid disc uses the regular centre solution u(0)=0u(0)=0 and σr(0)=σθ(0)\sigma_r(0)=\sigma_\theta(0). These equations are derived here from equilibrium and Hooke’s law; the uniform-disc limits are checked against the classical rotating-disc solutions of Timoshenko and Goodier and the university reference.

Shrink fit uses p=max⁡[0,(δ+uh,free−ud,free(a))/(Cd+Ch)]p=\max[0,(\delta+u_{h,\mathrm{free}}-u_{d,\mathrm{free}}(a))/(C_d+C_h)]. For a solid plane-stress hub, Ch=a(1−νh)/EhC_h=a(1-\nu_h)/E_h and uh,spin=ρhω2a3(1−νh)/(4Eh)u_{h,\mathrm{spin}}=\rho_h\omega^2a^3(1-\nu_h)/(4E_h). Separation is the first zero contact pressure on increasing speed. Contact can re-engage if the hub grows faster; pressure and limit searches include that transition.

The thickness-weighted average hoop stress is σˉθ=∫abhσθ dr/∫abh dr\bar\sigma_\theta=\int_a^b h\sigma_\theta\,dr/\int_a^b h\,dr. Half-disc force balance also gives σˉθ=[ρω2∫r2h dr+ah(a)p]/∫h dr\bar\sigma_\theta=[\rho\omega^2\int r^2h\,dr+a h(a)p]/\int h\,dr. Burst is the first speed satisfying σˉθ=kbSu\bar\sigma_\theta=k_bS_u (NASA SP-8052, printed p.81, PDF p.93, equations 82–84). kb=1k_b=1 is the ideal ductile average-stress criterion; a lower factor must come from relevant evidence. First local yield instead solves max⁡σr2−σrσθ+σθ2=Sy\max\sqrt{\sigma_r^2-\sigma_r\sigma_\theta+\sigma_\theta^2}=S_y. Bracketed scalar searches operate separately on either side of a contact transition.

Autodesk AVE-21/22 (PDF pp.113–116) provides the independent conical-disc FEM benchmark and identifies Roark’s sixth-edition rotating-member case. NASA CR-135033, printed p.28 / PDF p.39, describes a modified Hallinan method with additional notch and ductility effects; those proprietary modifications are not part of this calculator.

Assumptions

Homogeneous, isotropic, linearly elastic material with constant properties across each part; small strains; axisymmetric geometry, thickness and prescribed temperature; steady rotation and free axial faces. A free rim and either a free bore, a unilateral frictionless radial fit, or a regular solid centre. The solid hub shares rotational speed but may have different elastic and thermal properties. Interference is small enough to use the nominal bore radius in hub geometry. Disc temperature is prescribed linearly in radius; no heat-transfer solution is implied. The thermal changes refer to the same stress-free state as the interference. Tensile stress and outward displacement are positive. Steel preset strengths follow the table’s thickness ranges (up to 80 mm); other products and temperatures need custom data.

Where it applies

Plane stress suits thin discs with smooth thickness variations. A local shoulder, hub end effect or steep surface slope needs 3D analysis even if the radial ODE converges. A custom thickness profile is represented by nine stations with PCHIP interpolation; increasing the integration grid cannot recover features missing between those stations. The default 512 intervals can be doubled under Advanced. A solid centre is initialized at r/b = 10⁻⁶ with the regular limiting solution; the omitted core load is negligible for smooth finite thickness and temperature. Field values are solved at grid nodes; plotted curves use those nodes, and reference read-offs use PCHIP.

The average-stress burst criterion assumes enough ductility to redistribute stress; it is not appropriate for brittle materials, defects or notch-controlled failure. A burst factor of 1 is an ideal comparison, not a validated overspeed rating. Do not interpret the yield or burst estimate as permission to operate or spin-test a rotor. Local stresses and growth above first yield are elastic extrapolations. Thermal strain redistributes local stress without changing the average resultant of a free disc; thermal weakening is covered only by the strengths you enter. Fit release is an elastic estimate; hub yielding, axial restraint, slip torque and friction are not checked. The contact status describes radial contact only.

Source correction: NASA TN D-8304 (1976) is Kilgore’s cryogenic wind-tunnel report, not a Hallinan burst reference. The burst criterion here is supported by NASA SP-8052; Hallinan context is from NASA CR-135033. No fracture, plastic-flow, fatigue, rotor-dynamics or containment assessment is performed.

References

  • Timoshenko, S. P. and Goodier, J. N., Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, 1970, rotating-disc theory (ISBN 9780070858053). Bibliographic record: https://find.library.upenn.edu/catalog/998501983503681
  • Roark, R. J. and Young, W. C., Roark’s Formulas for Stress and Strain, 6th ed., McGraw-Hill, 1989, §15.2 case 9, p.705, as cited and numerically checked in Autodesk AVE-21/22, pp.113–116: https://images.autodesk.com/adsk/files/AVEs_2014.pdf
  • NASA SP-8052, Liquid Rocket Engine Turbopump Inducers, May 1971, §3.7.3.1, printed p.81, average tangential stress and burst factor: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19710025474
  • Barack, W. N. and Domas, P. A., An Improved Turbine Disk Design to Increase Reliability of Aircraft Jet Engines, NASA CR-135033, July 1976, printed p.28, modified Hallinan context: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19760019113
  • Rajagiri School of Engineering & Technology, Advanced Mechanics of Solids, Module III, 2019, slides 57–60 / PDF pp.29–30, classical solid/annular discs and worked example: https://www.rajagiritech.ac.in/home/mech/Course_Content/Semester%20IV/ME%20202%20Advanced%20Mechanics%20of%20Solids/Module%203.pdf

Inputs

InputSymbolUnitDefault
Rotor geometrygeometryDisc with bore / ring
Outer radiusR_outermm200
Bore radiusR_boremm40
Thickness profileprofileLinear taper
Inner thicknesst_innermm12
Rim thicknesst_outermm6
Rotational speedn_rotrpm6000
Include thermal expansionthermal_onfalse
Material propertiesmat_modeStructural steel preset
Steel gradesteelS355
Young’s modulusE_customGPa210
Poisson’s rationu_custom0.3
Densityrho_customkg/m^37850
Thermal expansion coefficientalpha_custom1/K0.000012
Yield strengthSy_customMPa355
Ultimate tensile strengthSu_customMPa470
Burst strength factor
1 gives the ideal average-stress criterion; enter a factor supported by burst tests for your material and disc.
burst_factor1
Shrink-fitted solid hubhub_ontrue
Radial interference
Half the diametral interference at the stress-free thermal reference state.
interferenceum20
Hub materialhub_materialSame as disc
Hub Young’s modulusEh_customGPa210
Hub Poisson’s rationuh_custom0.3
Hub densityrhoh_customkg/m^37850
Hub expansion coefficientalphah_custom1/K0.000012
Inner temperature rise
Change from the stress-free state used to specify interference.
dT_innerK0
Rim temperature risedT_outerK0
Uniform hub temperature risedT_hubK0
Radial integration intervals
Double this count to check mesh convergence, especially for custom thickness.
N_grid512
Thickness at 0% spant_0mm12
Thickness at 12.5% spant_1mm11.25
Thickness at 25% spant_2mm10.5
Thickness at 37.5% spant_3mm9.75
Thickness at 50% spant_4mm9
Thickness at 62.5% spant_5mm8.25
Thickness at 75% spant_6mm7.5
Thickness at 87.5% spant_7mm6.75
Thickness at 100% spant_8mm6

Results

With the default inputs above, the calc gives:

ResultValue
Rim radial growth21.64 um
Inner radial growth18.78 um
Maximum hoop stress95.47 MPa
Maximum radial stress26.27 MPa
Maximum von Mises stress101.07 MPa
Peak stress radius40 mm
Average hoop stress48.09 MPa
Hub contact pressure10.4 MPa
Hub contactContact retained
Hub separation speed6,794 1/min
First local yield speed12,427 1/min
Average-stress burst estimate20,283 1/min
Rim surface speed125.7 m/s

Checked against sources

Each case below was calculated by this calc and agrees with the value from its source (within the tolerance where one is shown).

Roark conical disc — independent 2D FEM

Source: Autodesk Accuracy Verification Examples Manual, version 2013 (2014 download), AVE-21, pp. 113–114: 3984.45 psi radial and 7030.24 psi tangential at r=8.4 in. Density 0.2836 lb/in³ converted to mass density. Tolerances allow 0.55% for thin-disc versus axisymmetric FEM. The source's rounded Roark-table prediction (6902.9 psi hoop) differs from its own FEM by 1.84%; this solver retains the ODE and agrees with FEM instead.

Inputs: Outer radius = 508 mm; Bore radius = 101.6 mm; Inner thickness = 38.1 mm; Rim thickness = 12.7 mm; Rotational speed = 2,500 rpm; Shrink-fitted solid hub = no; Material properties = Custom material at operating temperature; Young’s modulus = 206.8 GPa; Density = 7,850 kg/m³; the others as above.

ResultSourceThis calc
Radial stress at 42% outer radius27.472 ± 0.15 MPa27.504 MPa
Hoop stress at 42% outer radius48.472 ± 0.25 MPa48.577 MPa

Uniform annular disc — published worked example

Source: Rajagiri School of Engineering & Technology, Advanced Mechanics of Solids, Module III (2019), slide 60 / PDF p.30. Published table gives hoop stress 100.17 MPa at the 25 mm bore and radial stress 43.97 MPa at r=100 mm. Slide 59's 0.25 mm is a typographical error: the 50 mm bore diameter and the table both establish r=0.025 m. The maximum radial stress is at sqrt(ab)=100 mm.

Inputs: Thickness profile = Uniform; Outer radius = 400 mm; Bore radius = 25 mm; Inner thickness = 10 mm; Rotational speed = 3,000 rpm; Shrink-fitted solid hub = no; Material properties = Custom material at operating temperature; Young’s modulus = 200 GPa; Density = 7,800 kg/m³; Poisson’s ratio = 0.25; the others as above.

ResultSourceThis calc
Maximum hoop stress100.2 MPa100.2 MPa
Radial stress at 25% outer radius43.97 MPa43.979 MPa
Maximum radial stress43.98 ± 0.08 MPa43.979 MPa

Related Resources

Responses

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

L ading...