MCS Truck Charging: Cable Heat, Losses and Charge Time
Estimate MCS truck charging losses, cable and contact temperatures, and charge time with copper self-heating and an adjustable cooling model.
Megawatt charging for trucks makes small electrical resistances significant: cable loss and connector heating grow with the square of current. This MCS calculator helps charging engineers, fleet planners and students compare conductor area, cable length, contact resistance and cooling before investigating a specific charging assembly.
Enter the charging current and the representative DC voltage at the dispenser. Cable length is one way, and copper area is the total area for one DC polarity. The calculation includes two equal conductors and two equal contact paths. Contact-path resistance is per pole and includes whichever mating contacts and terminations you assign to the cooled contact node. Avoid counting a termination again in the cable resistance multiplier.
The cooling inputs describe an equivalent thermal network. Cable thermal resistance multiplied by length relates conductor rise to watts per metre; contact thermal resistance and heat capacity describe one contact node. The supplied values are an illustrative liquid-cooling scenario, not data for a named product. Replace them with measured values or a validated thermal model. The effective sink temperature should account for coolant warming along the assembly. At the start of the session, both nodes are assumed to be at that temperature.
Set usable battery capacity and the starting and target state of charge as fractions. The tool integrates vehicle-terminal power after cable and contact losses, then applies vehicle storage efficiency to find the time needed to add the requested stored energy. The elapsed-time play control shows charging progress and the approach to thermal equilibrium. Temperature plots and result cards distinguish session-end temperature from the continuous-current thermal ceiling associated with your chosen limits.
Copper resistance rises as the conductor heats. The model includes that feedback analytically, while contact resistance stays fixed at the operating value you enter. A higher contact resistance can cause substantial local heating even when total charging efficiency remains high. Increasing cable length increases total loss; with the same cooling per metre, it does not change the conductor temperature predicted by this distributed-equivalent model.
The calculation does not predict a truck's BMS charging curve, voltage rise with state of charge, power sharing, thermal derating, precooling, coolant flow distribution, cooling failure, contact ageing, asymmetric poles, insulation hot spots or touch temperatures. Current and dispenser voltage are constant representative values, so charge time is a scenario estimate rather than a vehicle charging guarantee. Battery internal heating, charger AC/DC conversion and cooling auxiliaries need separate analysis.
Installation work belongs to a qualified person. Use actual manufacturer ratings and protection requirements, and check against the standard in force. IEC TS 63379:2026, edition 1.0, provides MCS assembly requirements; this calculator does not implement its compliance tests or assign its temperature limits.
How it is calculated
The DC circuit has two identical copper conductors and two identical contact paths. For each cable pole, and . Copper resistivity 0.017241 Ω·mm²/m and temperature coefficient 0.00393 K⁻¹ follow NBS Handbook 100 (1966), PDF p. 9. Density is 8890 kg/m³; the 385 J/(kg·K) heat capacity follows the Kanthal C11000 ETP datasheet (2021).
Each pole has a cable thermal node and a separate contact node, both connected to a fixed effective sink; there is no direct thermal coupling between the nodes. The per-pole cable equation is , where and . Define . For , and . The rise is . Contact rise is with fixed measured contact resistance.
Total cable/contact loss is . Integrating dispenser power minus these losses gives vehicle-terminal energy. A bracketed root solves for the time at which storage efficiency times that energy equals the requested capacity increment. The continuous-current ceiling solves the steady heat balance at each entered temperature limit; the lower result is reported. Current is not automatically derated.
The circuit, thermal ODE and its analytical integral are derived here. NBS wire-table cases verify resistance and temperature correction; the manufacturer case verifies DC power only. These references do not validate the illustrative thermal parameters against an MCS assembly.
Assumptions
Constant charging current and representative constant dispenser voltage; stored-energy state of charge is proportional to usable battery energy. Two equal copper poles, uniform cable temperature per pole, constant specific heat and cooling parameters. All nodes initially equal the cooling sink temperature. Cable thermal mass includes copper multiplied by the entered factor. Contact resistance is an operating-condition value held constant and covers the same path as its thermal node. No axial or cable-to-contact heat transfer is resolved.
Defaults for contact resistance, cooling, thermal mass and temperature limits are transparent example inputs, not measured MCS product data. Fit thermal resistance from steady temperature rise divided by node heat and fit heat capacity from the measured time constant. For the cable, include copper resistance feedback when fitting.
Where it applies
Use for comparative electrical-loss and first-order thermal studies of DC truck charging with a stable cable equilibrium, positive vehicle-terminal power, and modeled node temperatures up to 200 °C. Short pulses and local hot spots may need a distributed model; coolant warming and flow dependence are absorbed only into the user-supplied effective sink and thermal resistances. A copper-only thermal mass is not a prediction of the full assembly's measured transient.
The reported thermal ceiling checks the entered node temperature limits only. It does not establish ampacity, connector surface temperature, touch safety, protection response, cooling-loss behavior, or permitted charging current. The charge-time scenario excludes BMS taper, changing pack voltage, power limits and charging interruptions. Storage efficiency describes vehicle-terminal energy to stored energy; upstream AC/DC and cooling auxiliary losses are excluded.
IEC TS 63379:2026, edition 1.0, is relevant context for MCS assemblies, not the source of this model or its example temperature limits. Check actual manufacturer ratings and check against the standard in force.
References
- [NBS Handbook 100, Copper Wire Tables (1966)](https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/hb/nbshandbook100.pdf), PDF pp. 9, 29–30: copper constants and independent wire-table checks.
- [Kanthal C11000 ETP datasheet (2021)](https://prodshop.kanthal.com/en/products/datasheets/material-datasheets/wire/conductive-wire/c11000-etp/): density and specific heat at 20 °C.
- [HUBER+SUHNER MCS1500 announcement (2023)](https://www.hubersuhner.com/en/newsroom/company-news/news-ad-hoc-news/hubersuhner-announces-breakthrough-innovation-in-megawatt-charging-for-commercial-vehicles): published electrical power/current pair; not a thermal calibration.
- [IEC TS 63379:2026, edition 1.0](https://webstore.iec.ch/en/publication/67975): official public scope; compliance tests are outside this calculator.
Inputs
| Input | Symbol | Unit | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charging current Constant session current. Apply actual EVSE, vehicle and assembly current limits separately. | I_dc | A | 1500 |
| DC voltage at dispenser Representative constant voltage upstream of the cable. Vehicle terminal voltage is lower by the calculated loop drop. | V_dc | V | 1000 |
| One-way cable length Length of each of two equal DC conductors. The return path is included automatically. | L_cab | m | 5 |
| Copper area per DC pole Total copper area in parallel for one polarity. Both poles have the same area. | A_cu | mm^2 | 70 |
| Cable resistance multiplier Example allowance of 3% for stranding and construction. Adjust to match measured resistance at 20 °C; this is not a material conductivity selector. | k_lay | 1.03 | |
| Contact-path resistance per pole Example only. Sum mating contact and terminations assigned to one cooled contact node; use resistance measured at operating conditions. The model holds this resistance constant. | R_pin | uohm | 30 |
| Effective cooling sink temperature Fixed local coolant or equivalent sink temperature. Both cable and contact start at this temperature. Use a representative warmed coolant temperature, not necessarily the coolant inlet. | T_sink | °C | 30 |
| Cable thermal resistance × length Example liquid-cooling scenario, not a product rating. Per-pole conductor rise divided by its loss per metre. Whole-pole thermal resistance is this value divided by cable length. | R_line | K*m/W | 0.06 |
| Cable thermal mass multiplier 1 uses copper mass only. Increase only when an effective thermal mass has been identified from a measured transient. | k_mass | 1 | |
| Contact-to-sink thermal resistance Example only, for one pole and the same heat source represented by the contact-path resistance. Obtain from thermal testing or a validated model. | R_thj | K/W | 0.5 |
| Contact effective heat capacity Example only, per pole. A measured first-order time constant divided by thermal resistance gives this value. | C_thj | J/K | 300 |
| Cable conductor temperature limit Your design limit for this assembly; 90 °C is a scenario value, not an MCS compliance limit. | T_limw | °C | 90 |
| Contact temperature limit Your design limit for the modeled contact node; this does not check connector touch-surface temperature. | T_limj | °C | 90 |
| Usable battery capacity Usable stored-energy capacity. State of charge is treated as proportional to stored energy. | E_pack | kWh | 600 |
| Starting state of charge (0–1) | s_start | 0.1 | |
| Target state of charge (0–1) | s_target | 0.8 | |
| Vehicle storage efficiency (0–1) Fraction of vehicle-terminal DC energy stored in the battery. Excludes upstream charger conversion losses and cooling auxiliary power. | eta_b | 0.97 | |
| Elapsed charging time Play the calculated constant-current session. Results cards describe the complete session; the schematic follows this time. | t_play | s | 30 |
Results
With the default inputs above, the calc gives:
| Result | Value |
|---|---|
| Charge time | 17.4 min |
| Cable temperature at charge end | 71.1 °C |
| Contact temperature at charge end | 63.7 °C |
| Cable + contact loss at charge end | 6.99 kW |
| Contact loss, both poles | 135 W |
| Cable + contact heat per session | 2.023 kWh |
| Cable/contact energy efficiency (%) | 99.535 |
| Loop voltage drop at charge end | 4.66 V |
| Modeled continuous-current ceiling | 1,758 A |
| Stored energy added | 420 kWh |
Checked against sources
Each case below was calculated by this calc and agrees with the value from its source (within the tolerance where one is shown).
NBS copper wire: 53.49 mm² at 20 °C
Source: NBS Handbook 100, Copper Wire Tables (1966), Table 10, printed p. 23 (PDF p. 29). The published 0.3223 Ω/km and 475.5 kg/km are converted to a 1 m conductor. Tolerances allow rounding of tabulated area and resistance. This checks copper geometry, not MCS cooling.
Inputs: One-way cable length = 1 m; Copper area per DC pole = 53.49 mm²; Cable resistance multiplier = 1; Effective cooling sink temperature = 20 °C; Charging current = 100 A; the others as above.
| Result | Source | This calc |
|---|---|---|
| Cable resistance per pole at 20 °C | 3.223 × 10⁻⁴ Ω | 3.223 × 10⁻⁴ Ω |
| Copper mass per pole | 0.4755 kg | 0.4755 kg |
NBS copper wire: resistance at 100 °C
Source: NBS Handbook 100 (1966), Table 11, printed p. 24 (PDF p. 30). AWG 0 is 53.49 mm² with resistance 0.4237 Ω/km at 100 °C. Expected value is for 1 m. This independently tabulated value checks temperature correction; it is not a connector-temperature validation.
Inputs: One-way cable length = 1 m; Copper area per DC pole = 53.49 mm²; Cable resistance multiplier = 1; Effective cooling sink temperature = 100 °C; Charging current = 100 A; Cable conductor temperature limit = 150 °C; Contact temperature limit = 150 °C; the others as above.
| Result | Source | This calc |
|---|---|---|
| Cable resistance per pole before charging | 4.237 × 10⁻⁴ Ω | 4.237 × 10⁻⁴ Ω |
Manufacturer MCS1500 electrical power
Source: HUBER+SUHNER, MCS1500 announcement (June 2023): 2250 kW at 1500 A. Using the corresponding 1500 V checks dispenser power and the kilo/mega scaling. No thermal parameters or temperatures in this calc are claimed to represent that product.
Inputs: DC voltage at dispenser = 1,500 V; the others as above.
| Result | Source | This calc |
|---|---|---|
| DC power at dispenser | 2,250,000 W | 2,250,000 W |
Related Resources
Related articles
Related courses
IEC Electrical Schematics and Industrial Control Panels
Basic Electrical Controls & Diagram Reading

Responses