LDO vs Buck Converter: Efficiency, Heat, Ripple and Noise
Compare an LDO, synchronous buck and buck followed by an LDO. Calculate losses, junction temperature, PFM ripple, PSRR filtering and battery runtime, with a voltage–load selection map.
When should you switch from an LDO to a buck converter? There is no universal current threshold. The answer changes with input voltage, load, regulator ground current, cooling and the amount of ripple your circuit tolerates. This LDO vs buck converter calculator compares three ways to power the same load: a linear regulator, a synchronous buck converter, and a buck followed by an LDO.
Start with the supply voltage, required output and load current. Enter the LDO's rated-load dropout, ground current and board thermal resistance. For the buck, use the effective inductance and capacitance, hot MOSFET resistances, inductor DCR, switching times, gate charge and control-circuit current. The defaults describe illustrative components, rather than a particular manufacturer's complete design. Replace them with values for your candidates.
Choose how the gate rail is powered. The default internal linear supply counts gate charging and its voltage-drop loss as buck IC heat. The external-rail option includes the entered conversion efficiency in battery power while keeping external supply heat out of buck junction temperature. Use gate charge and on-resistances specified for the entered drive voltage.
The topology comparison puts efficiency, total heat, the hottest IC junction, output AC and regulated battery runtime side by side. The recommendation chooses the lowest input power among options that meet the entered dropout, duty, peak-current, junction-temperature and AC limits. Tightening the noise budget can make a buck followed by an LDO worthwhile even though the extra stage consumes power. The power-crossover result compares LDO and buck losses alone; it does not include those eligibility limits or component cost.
LDO power dissipation includes both the voltage drop times load current and the power consumed by ground current. Buck converter light load efficiency includes the controller's bias current and the reduced pulse frequency of an ideal PFM controller. Forced PWM retains switching and gate-drive losses at light load. The efficiency chart shows this difference across five decades of load by default.
Ripple and intrinsic noise have different causes. The calculator integrates the buck's periodic ripple harmonics inside your chosen frequency band and applies the entered LDO PSRR curve to each cascade harmonic. Enter PSRR data measured at the relevant load, headroom and output capacitance. The harmonic bars use each topology's own effective pulse frequency; the same order can therefore represent different frequencies. Intrinsic noise inputs must cover the same bandwidth. If the retained harmonics end inside the band, the AC result includes a conservative unresolved-energy bound; more harmonics sharpen that bound.
The voltage–load map shows where each option meets the limits and uses the least input power. Its marker locates the operating point. Battery runtime uses a linear voltage-versus-charge curve between the two battery voltages and stops when regulation, current or thermal limits are first exceeded. It does not stop at the AC budget, so check noise eligibility separately.
This tool supports engineering comparisons and teaching. It does not design compensation, verify LDO stability, predict switching-edge ringing or EMI, or model battery impedance, ageing and protection circuits. Check absolute voltage ratings, minimum on-time, component tolerances and transient performance against the selected data sheets before building.
How it is calculated
LDO. Following TI SLVA079 §§1, 2, 4 and 12, input power is and heat is . A PMOS pass resistance is estimated from rated-load dropout divided by rated current. Junction temperature is ambient plus .
Buck. The triangular-current power stage follows the volt-second and capacitor-charge relationships in TI SLVA477. The ripple and loss waveform uses ideal duty ; . PWM has . In the ideal constant-on-time PFM model, pulses retain the boundary-current peak , pulse rate becomes , and . Integrating the ramp areas enforces charge balance. TI SNVA857 §2.3 describes the frequency reduction.
MOSFET conduction is RMS-current squared times duty-weighted on-resistance; inductor copper loss uses full-cycle RMS current. Switching overlap uses each edge's current and its rise/fall time. Gate-driver charging loss is . For an internal linear gate supply, its additional heat is , so total gate-related input power is (TI SSZTBF1, equations 1–4). Both parts heat the buck IC. An external rail supplied from the same battery instead requires ; its conversion loss heats the external supply. Bias loss is , capacitance loss is , and diode dead-time and recovery losses are added. Core/AC winding loss scales with pulse rate. Output ESR loss uses capacitor RMS current. These loss categories follow ROHM Rev.004 §§1–9. Only IC losses heat the buck IC; magnetic, output capacitor and external gate-supply conversion losses remain external.
Ripple and noise. The piecewise-linear current has analytical Fourier coefficients, evaluated through real sine and cosine terms to avoid complex-arithmetic overhead. Each harmonic sees . RMS powers are summed inside the selected band. Log-frequency PCHIP interpolation supplies PSRR; harmonic voltage is multiplied by , as defined in ADI AN-1120. The LDO's intrinsic noise is added in quadrature. Cascade broadband buck noise is conservatively attenuated by the smallest PSRR in the band. The unfiltered p-p estimate adds the exact capacitive charge swing to ESR swing; these extrema need not coincide. The ripple trough is obtained from the capacitor-charge polynomials plus ESR, after subtracting their cycle mean. If the harmonic count ends inside the noise band, Parseval's identity and the exact time-domain mean-square voltage bound the remaining energy. All unresolved energy is conservatively assigned to the band, with the largest LDO transmission in that band.
Cascade and selection. The buck supplies and load . Total losses include both stages. Cascade dropout is checked at the estimated buck ripple trough. Following the nonideal volt-second method in TI SSZTCO3, PWM regulation requires . Both MOSFET resistances and inductor DCR therefore enter the duty check. Eligibility and battery cutoff use the division-free margin , which is negative if the duty denominator is nonpositive. The cascade uses its intermediate voltage and load including LDO ground current. Internal gate-rail availability is checked at each input voltage. Selection minimizes input power after applying current, duty, thermal, dropout and in-band RMS AC limits. The first power-only LDO/buck crossover between 1 µA and 10 A is found by bracketed root searches on each continuous mode branch; a bias-current jump at the PFM/PWM boundary is not accepted as equal power. A blank crossover result means no root was found in that interval; the direction of the power advantage can differ between crossings.
Battery. Midpoint integration of follows a linear voltage-versus-charge curve and stops at the first electrical or thermal failure. Instantaneous constant-voltage runtime is also retained in the calculation steps.
Assumptions
Steady load; synchronous buck; small output ripple; ideal ramps and regulated target voltage. On-resistances, DCR, dropout and ground currents are entered at the intended operating temperature; no automatic temperature coefficient is invented. MOSFETs, gate driver and the optional internal linear gate supply share one thermal package. The default gate rail is 3.3 V. An internal rail requires input voltage at least equal to the drive voltage; zero gate-regulator dropout is assumed. For an external gate rail, its entered efficiency refers to conversion from the same battery, while its heat remains outside the buck IC.
Defaults are illustrative engineering inputs. The buck resistances, inductance, frequency, edge times, hard-switched capacitance and gate charge align with the open ROHM example, with bias and noise settings chosen for comparison. PSRR values are an editable illustrative curve, not a specified device. Apply a curve valid for the worst load and minimum headroom of both LDO paths. Noise sources are uncorrelated; intrinsic RMS inputs refer to the selected band.
PFM consists of one boundary-current pulse followed by idle time. PWM/PFM bias currents are separate. Include control and gate-supply no-load currents referred to the main input, but exclude the dynamic gate-charge current already modeled. External gate-supply efficiency excludes no-load losses included in those bias inputs. Core and AC winding loss must be supplied for this ripple swing. Battery capacity is usable charge at the stated conditions; voltage falls linearly with charge removed.
Fourier coefficients and capacitor-charge integrals are derived here from the ideal current ramps; the cited application notes provide the regulator definitions, loss categories and mode-transition context.
Where it applies
Loss estimation is a first-order triangular-waveform model, not a controller or transistor simulation. Resistive drops do not modify the ideal ripple slopes; the duty/headroom check uses average-current PWM volt-second balance with both MOSFET resistances and DCR. This is also the full-rate headroom criterion in PFM; actual PFM pulse-width limits need checking. A nonpositive duty denominator is infeasible and the required-duty result is blank. Use gate charge, switching times and hot on-resistances valid for the entered gate voltage. Check real gate-regulator dropout and driver UVLO; an unavailable internal rail excludes both buck options and ends their battery discharge. External gate-supply efficiency is treated as constant over the sweep. Separate θJA values assume negligible thermal coupling between packages. Verify actual duty, minimum on/off times, IC absolute ratings, LDO stability, load transients and inductor saturation. Reverse recovery is neglected in PFM because pulses start at zero current; the entered charge is applied in PWM. Input capacitor ESR, low-side switching overlap, PCB losses, parasitic ringing and EMI are not included. Source-ripple transfer through the buck's own control loop is not modeled; source sine ripple applies to the direct LDO path.
The PSRR curve is held at its endpoint outside 10 Hz–100 MHz. Real rejection changes with load, headroom, capacitor and layout. Harmonic filtering uses magnitude, so no time-domain cascade p-p value is asserted. Increase the harmonic count to sharpen very-light-load results. When the spectrum ends below the band edge, the RMS result is an upper estimate: omitted harmonic energy is bounded from the exact capacitor/ESR waveform integral. This also assigns out-of-band tail energy to the band and can overestimate the cascade's filtered periodic component substantially. The bound prevents optimistic noise eligibility on the map; a tight noise budget may therefore require more harmonics or a measured spectrum. Harmonic bars show the first 16 orders, including orders outside the RMS budget's band.
At defaults the map solves 41 × 31 points with 160 harmonics using the same harmonic model, then interpolates input powers and signed eligibility margins along both axes with PCHIP before classifying a 256 × 256 display with discrete topology colours. The solved grid and harmonic count keep the full calculation under about three seconds; narrow regions and boundaries can move by a solved interval (about 0.22 V and 0.17 load decades at defaults). Increase map samples or use the exact operating-point comparison near a boundary. Do not interpret an interpolated boundary as a component rating.
Projected losses and efficiencies are displayed for comparison even when an option is outside limits; only eligible options can win. Battery runtime ends at electrical or thermal cutoff and does not imply the noise limit is met throughout discharge. The midpoint cutoff has one discharge-interval uncertainty; refine the interval count for a marginal case. No battery impedance, rate effect, self-discharge, ageing, UVLO, charger, protection or temperature-dependent capacity model is included.
References
- Texas Instruments, SLVA079, Understanding the Terms and Definitions of LDO Voltage Regulators, October 1999, §§1, 2, 4, 12. https://www.ti.com/lit/an/slva079/slva079.pdf
- Texas Instruments, SLVA477, Basic Calculation of a Buck Converter's Power Stage, §§2, 3, 7; publisher URL currently serves Rev. C (2026). The contradictory efficiency factors in its main text and appendix are not used: duty is derived from volt-second balance. https://www.ti.com/lit/an/slva477b/slva477b.pdf
- Analog Devices, Glenn Morita, AN-1120, Noise Sources in Low Dropout (LDO) Regulators; PSRR, headroom and intrinsic noise. https://www.analog.com/en/resources/app-notes/an-1120.html
- ROHM, Efficiency of Buck Converter, No.64AN035E Rev.004, November 2022, pp.1–7. https://fscdn.rohm.com/en/products/databook/applinote/ic/power/switching_regulator/buck_converter_efficiency_app-e.pdf
- Texas Instruments, SNVA857, Understanding Mode Transitions for LMR33620/30 and LMR36006/15, April 2019, §2.3. https://www.ti.com/lit/an/snva857/snva857.pdf
- Analog Devices, Henry Zhang, AN-140, Basic Concepts of Linear Regulator and Switching Mode Power Supplies; volt-second balance and conduction/switching losses. https://www.analog.com/en/resources/app-notes/an-140.html
- Texas Instruments, Pavani Jella, SSZTCO3, Duty Cycle Calculation in WEBENCH Power Designer, May 2015; nonideal volt-second balance. https://www.ti.com/document-viewer/lit/html/SSZTCO3
- Texas Instruments, Akshay Mehta, SSZTBF1, Gate Charge and IC Losses, equations 1–4; integrated driver and linear gate-supply power. https://www.ti.com/document-viewer/lit/html/SSZTBF1/GUID-8A226686-9939-4ACF-9D60-E1FDB594412B
Inputs
| Input | Symbol | Unit | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input voltage | Vin | V | 5 |
| Output voltage | Vout | V | 3.3 |
| Load current | Iout | A | 0.1 |
| Ambient temperature | Tamb | °C | 25 |
| Junction temperature limit | Tlimit | °C | 125 |
| Cascade LDO headroom Buck output is the final output plus this voltage. | headroom | V | 0.5 |
| Usable battery capacity Usable charge between the full and end voltages, before regulator cutoff. | capacity | Ah | 2 |
| Battery end voltage | Vbat_end | V | 3.6 |
| Battery full voltage A linear voltage-versus-remaining-charge curve is assumed. | Vbat_full | V | 5 |
| LDO ground current Use ground current at the intended load and temperature. | Iq_ldo | uA | 10 |
| LDO rated current | Ildo_max | A | 1 |
| Dropout at rated current Use the worst-case dropout at the LDO rated current. | Vdrop_rated | V | 0.25 |
| LDO junction-to-ambient resistance Use the value for your package, copper area and airflow. | theta_ldo | K/W | 80 |
| PWM switching frequency | f_sw | kHz | 1000 |
| Inductance | L_ind | uH | 4.7 |
| Effective output capacitance Use capacitance after DC bias and temperature derating. | C_out | uF | 22 |
| Output capacitor ESR | R_esr | mohm | 5 |
| High-side on-resistance Use on-resistance at the entered gate voltage and expected junction temperature. | R_hi | mohm | 100 |
| Low-side on-resistance Use on-resistance at the entered gate voltage and expected junction temperature. | R_lo | mohm | 70 |
| Inductor DCR Enter DCR at the expected winding temperature. | R_dcr | mohm | 80 |
| Buck and inductor peak limit Enter the lower of minimum switch current limit and inductor saturation rating. | Ipeak_max | A | 2 |
| Maximum PWM duty ratio | D_max | 0.95 | |
| Buck IC junction-to-ambient resistance Applies to IC losses; inductor and capacitor losses remain external. | theta_buck | K/W | 60 |
| Buck PWM bias current Include control and gate-supply idle currents at the input; exclude dynamic gate-charge current. | Iq_pwm | uA | 500 |
| Buck PFM bias current Include sleep and gate-supply idle currents at the input; exclude dynamic gate-charge current. | Iq_pfm | uA | 20 |
| Combined MOSFET gate charge Sum both MOSFETs at the entered gate voltage; exclude gate-charge current from bias current. | Q_gate | nC | 2 |
| Gate drive voltage | V_drive | V | 3.3 |
| Gate supply arrangement | gate_supply | Internal linear supply | |
| External gate-supply efficiency Conversion efficiency excluding idle current already entered under bias current. | eta_gate | 0.9 | |
| High-side rise time | t_rise | ns | 4 |
| High-side fall time | t_fall | ns | 6 |
| Effective hard-switched capacitance Effective capacitance for hard-switching energy at the operating voltage. | C_oss | pF | 80 |
| Body-diode recovery charge | Q_rr | nC | 0 |
| Dead time per transition | t_dead | ns | 15 |
| Body-diode forward voltage | V_diode | V | 0.6 |
| Core and AC winding loss in PWM Enter loss for this ripple swing at the entered PWM frequency. | P_core | mW | 5 |
| Input sine ripple, RMS | v_source | mV | 1 |
| Input sine ripple frequency | f_source | kHz | 100 |
| LDO intrinsic noise, RMS Integrated intrinsic noise over the entered noise band. | n_ldo | uV | 20 |
| Buck broadband noise, RMS Integrated noise over the entered band, excluding periodic ripple. | n_buck | uV | 50 |
| Allowed output AC, RMS Includes in-band ripple and intrinsic noise combined by RMS. | noise_limit | uV | 1000 |
| Noise band lower frequency | f_low | Hz | 10 |
| Noise band upper frequency | f_high | kHz | 10000 |
| PSRR at 10 Hz (dB) Use the same worst-case load, headroom and output capacitor for every PSRR point. | ps_10 | 70 | |
| PSRR at 1 kHz (dB) | ps_1k | 65 | |
| PSRR at 100 kHz (dB) | ps_100k | 40 | |
| PSRR at 1 MHz (dB) | ps_1m | 25 | |
| PSRR at 10 MHz (dB) | ps_10m | 10 | |
| PSRR at 100 MHz (dB) | ps_100m | 0 | |
| Map minimum input voltage | map_vmin | V | 3.35 |
| Map maximum input voltage | map_vmax | V | 12 |
| Sweep minimum load | map_imin | A | 0.00001 |
| Sweep maximum load | map_imax | A | 1 |
| Light-load mode | buck_mode | Automatic PFM / PWM | |
| Ripple harmonics Increase to check ripple-spectrum convergence at very light load. | N_harm | 160 | |
| Map voltage samples Solved grid; power and limit margins are interpolated for the map. | N_map | 41 | |
| Battery discharge intervals Increase to resolve the first regulation or thermal cutoff. | N_bat | 60 |
Results
With the default inputs above, the calc gives:
| Result | Value |
|---|---|
| Lowest-power eligible option | Buck |
| LDO / buck power crossover | 33.554 uA |
| Buck ripple p-p upper estimate | 3.026 mV |
| LDO dropout margin at input ripple trough | 1.674 V |
Checked against sources
Each case below was calculated by this calc and agrees with the value from its source (within the tolerance where one is shown).
TI TPS76933 efficiency at 4.5 V
Source: TI SLVA079, October 1999, p.4, worked efficiency example 1: 3.3 V, 100 mA, 17 µA, 4.5 V gives 73.3%. Its wording calls this the minimum; with nonzero ground current the 80 mA endpoint is fractionally lower. This case checks the stated 100 mA operating point. https://www.ti.com/lit/an/slva079/slva079.pdf
Inputs: Input voltage = 4.5 V; LDO ground current = 17 uA; the others as above.
| Result | Source | This calc |
|---|---|---|
| LDO efficiency | 0.733 ± 0.001 | 0.7332 |
TI TPS76933 efficiency at 4.0 V
Source: TI SLVA079, October 1999, p.4, worked efficiency example 2: same 100 mA load and 17 µA ground current, input reduced to 4 V, quoted efficiency 82.5%. https://www.ti.com/lit/an/slva079/slva079.pdf
Inputs: Input voltage = 4 V; LDO ground current = 17 uA; the others as above.
| Result | Source | This calc |
|---|---|---|
| LDO efficiency | 0.825 ± 0.001 | 0.8249 |
ROHM synchronous buck loss example
Source: ROHM Efficiency of Buck Converter, Rev.004 (2022), PDF p.6. Published loss components for 12 V to 5 V, 3 A, 4.7 µH, 1 MHz. Rounded values checked separately; omitted input-capacitor/low-side transition losses are not included in a total-loss comparison.
Inputs: Input voltage = 12 V; Output voltage = 5 V; Load current = 3 A; Gate drive voltage = 5 V; Buck PWM bias current = 1,000 uA; Light-load mode = Forced PWM; Map minimum input voltage = 5.1 V; Map maximum input voltage = 15 V; Battery full voltage = 12 V; Battery end voltage = 8 V; Buck and inductor peak limit = 5 A; LDO rated current = 5 A; Allowed output AC, RMS = 100,000 uV; Dead time per transition = 30 ns; the others as above.
| Result | Source | This calc |
|---|---|---|
| High-side conduction loss | 0.376 ± 0.002 W | 0.3763 W |
| Low-side conduction loss | 0.369 ± 0.002 W | 0.3688 W |
| Inductor DCR loss | 0.723 ± 0.002 W | 0.7226 W |
| Gate drive loss | 0.01 ± 1 × 10⁻⁴ W | 0.01 W |
| Buck bias loss | 0.012 ± 1 × 10⁻⁴ W | 0.012 W |
| Hard-switched capacitance loss | 0.0058 ± 1 × 10⁻⁴ W | 0.00576 W |
Reject buck when both switch drops exceed duty limit
Source: Independent reviewer reproduction: at 5 V to 3.3 V and 1 A, the nonideal PWM duty is about 0.707, above the entered 0.69 limit; no buck runtime is possible even at full battery voltage. An unpublished regression using the volt-second method in TI SSZTCO3, not a measured reference. https://www.ti.com/document-viewer/lit/html/SSZTCO3
Inputs: Light-load mode = Forced PWM; Load current = 1 A; High-side on-resistance = 10 mohm; Low-side on-resistance = 500 mohm; Maximum PWM duty ratio = 0.69; the others as above.
| Result | Source | This calc |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest-power eligible option | 0 | 0 |
| Buck regulated runtime | 0 h | 0 h |
| Required PWM duty ratio | 0.7067 | 0.7067 |
Internal linear gate supply changes the lowest-power option
Source: Independent reviewer reproduction: 20 nC at 1 MHz draws 20 mA from an internal linear gate supply. At 12 V the gate-related input power is 240 mW, including 140 mW beyond the 5 V driver power; with the other default losses the direct LDO wins. Unpublished regression; the supply-loss derivation is TI SSZTBF1, equations 1–4. https://www.ti.com/document-viewer/lit/html/SSZTBF1/GUID-8A226686-9939-4ACF-9D60-E1FDB594412B
Inputs: Input voltage = 12 V; Load current = 0.02 A; Combined MOSFET gate charge = 20 nC; Gate drive voltage = 5 V; Light-load mode = Forced PWM; the others as above.
| Result | Source | This calc |
|---|---|---|
| Lowest-power eligible option | 1 | 1 |
| Gate drive plus supply input power | 0.24 W | 0.24 W |
| Gate-supply conversion loss | 0.14 W | 0.14 W |
Related Resources
Related articles
-
Design and Performance Analysis of a Two-Stage LED Driver Incorporating Boost Power Factor Correction and Flyback DC–DC Converter Using PLECS Simulation -
A High-Efficiency Series Capacitor Buck Converter with Constant On-Time Control: Modeling, Simulation, and Performance Analysis Using PLECS -
Multi-Scale Numerical Investigation of Buoyancy-Driven Nanofluid Heat Transfer with Particle-Scale Transport Effects in Matlab

Responses